Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krawutschke Tower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep, nomination withdrawn. Punkmorten 13:12, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Krawutschke Tower

Not too notable tower, and machine-translated anyway. Suggest deletion. Kusma (討論) 00:10, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - I couldn't fix it, perhaps someone fluent in German can save it. Ruby 00:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Comment - After repair of the article I still want it to be deleted because it looks like somebody's tree fort. Ruby 19:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Comment I can certainly empathise with that :-) Dlyons493 Talk 21:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Can't find it in either Yahoo or Google; likely not of sufficient importance to merit an article — although perhaps someone with a greater knowledge of German architecture / history can refute this. Deadsalmon 00:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, keeping in mind above suggestions. --King of All the Franks 00:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Seems to be a poor translation from de.wiki [1]. Improve rather than delete Dlyons493 Talk 01:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • It is not a translation, but a work of the Babelfish. Compare this: [2]. No human work will be lost if this article is deleted. Kusma (討論) 02:09, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment I've done a basic translation. The article should probably be moved. Dlyons493 Talk 05:12, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep referenced, fairly notable. Found a couple more references: [3], [4], [5], [6] -- Astrokey44|talk 05:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as its been translated properly now Jcuk 09:03, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as translated by User:Dlyons493. JIP | Talk 09:33, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep but only because there's no obvious target for a merge Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 09:47, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep per JzG. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-20 10:31Z
• Keep. Maybe tag as stub. --StuffOfInterest 13:24, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep Seems like there could be more to it. Improve rather than delete and stub if necessary -Spartanfox86 19:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Nice little article with picture. Piccadilly 22:39, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. If the f'ing tower stood in Kansas, it wouldn't even be nominated for deletion, I'm sure. Damn US-centrism. —Nightstallion (?) 23:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

That's because Kansas is so flat you'd be able to see the Sears Tower in Chicago from the dang thing. Ruby 00:38, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

• • I find it amusing to be accused of US-centrism. I do live in the US right now, but most USAns I know seem to think that I have a German perspective of things. Anyway...
• Nomination withdrawn, the work of Dlyons493 should not go to waste. Kusma (討論) 01:27, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.