Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitty's Dish
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I find the nominator's and User:Satori Son's comments compelling. This AFD is hereby closed and the associated page deleted. Regards —Encephalon 10:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kitty's Dish
About a not-notable animated television pilot. "Even though the pilot tested highly with focus groups it was not picked up as a regular series." Originally PRODDED. Prod removed without comment by User:Lesserredpanda. <200 Google hits, not all about subject. Most are about, well cat food, Nancy Reagan and Kitty Kelly. :) Dlohcierekim 05:55, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Of all the cockamamie BS listed on this site and you want to remove a real animated short created by Disney? One that exists on imdb and links to actors, writers and directors on this very site? Whatever.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.34.244.66 (talk • contribs). :) Dlohcierekim 12:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- No, I nominated for AfD an article about a not notable pilot that was never picked up by anyone. :) Dlohcierekim 12:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment This article has been recreated at Disney's Kitty's Dish. :) Dlohcierekim 14:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC) Listed for AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney's Kitty's Dish :) Dlohcierekim 14:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unproduced pilots are usually not notable. But feel free to nominate the cockamamie BS. ♥ «Charles A. L.» 18:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as insufficiently notable and lack of third-party sources per WP:V (the only source is IMDB, which has less stringent publishing requirements than Wikipedia's). For example, how are we to verify "the pilot tested highly with focus groups"? Based on the author's contributions here and here, it also seems like WP:VANITY. --Satori Son 12:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
