Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Andy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 21:56, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] King Andy
Not an expert, but this looks to be a hoax. Can't verify through google, and cited sources (checked through Amazon search) do not reference King Andy JJay 01:19, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --JJay 01:19, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per JJay. -- Ncsaint 01:35, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Linuxbeak | Alex Schenck 01:46, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. This is a hoax, of course. "King Andy" in Greece, c 1090s? LOL. Lived 1077-94, ie. did all that by the age of 17. Amazon has a "look inside" feature for The Western Way of War. There is no Andrew, Andy or King Andy in its index (yes, I did feel ridiculous checking). encephalon 03:01, 11 November 2005 (UTC) Addendum: I see JJay checked too. :) encephalon 03:02, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per above. NSLE (讨论) \<extra> 08:08, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete hoaxes. — Haeleth Talk 17:19, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. It's such a good laugh I am tempted to vote for keep. Tintin 21:36, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete hoax. --MPerel ( talk | contrib) 11:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. It reads legit enough, and there really isn't any proof against it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.196.223.90 (talk • contribs) 13:49, 15 November 2005 (UTC).
- Keep. It seems legit. Why delete it if you have no proof against it. I say keep it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.196.223.90 (talk • contribs) 14:18, 15 November 2005 (UTC).
- Delete. Hoax. *drew 02:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.