Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Buchanan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kim Buchanan
Adolphus79 has added {{db-attack}}, {{prod}}, and {{notability}} to this now, so let's have it out here. I assert that a person who's been found guilty of more than 100 child sex offences is notable. He's a former schoolteacher of mine so most of the article is from my memory and from reports in paper-based newspapers. The only online references I can find are [1], and [2], which prove merely that I didn't make this whole thing up. Richardcavell 23:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep This should be verifiable and I recall this in the news, but it needs to be cleaned up (for example, the throwaway line right at the end about being sighted by IGS students). Jammo (SM247) 23:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, but in definite need of clean-up. Danielrocks123 23:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep but must be edited to meet NPOV & WP:V. blue520 23:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Sounds very notable. Interlingua talk 01:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - the reason it was tagged was because there isn't a single reference... at first it did appear as a db-attack, then when you complained about that, I added the prod and notability... please cite your sources, and I won't have anything left to complain about... - Adolphus79 04:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Nominator mentions "reports in paper-based newspapers," but there is no use of these newspapers as either citations or references. --D-Rock (talk) 03:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
