Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiloquad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete – Gurch 15:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kiloquad

• Delete. WP:NOT a collection of indiscriminate information, and I believe that this could adequately be merged into another Star Trek article, such as, for example Treknobabble. — Mike •  16:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOR and WP:NOT (yes, it could be related to quantum computing, but a source would be nice). Without the OR it is a (Star Trek fandom) dicdef. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, the worst kind of crufty treknobabble. - Motor (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - this term is used frequently throughout the series, unlike some of the other stuff up for deletion today. BigDT 18:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete May be used a lot, but I rarely watched the show and I bet I could figure out that a kiloquad = 1000 quads. Not notable enough for its own article. Mention it in an appropriate episode description where it plays a major part (if there is one) if there need be an explanation somewhere. GassyGuy 21:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per GassyGuy, or Merge and Redir to Treknobabble. KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• REDIRECT to treknobabble 132.205.45.148 19:38, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the term was never defined precisely because Sternbach and Okuda didn't want to be outstripped by real technological advances. Basically fancruft. Thatcher131 21:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.