Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kid emo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kid emo

Was tagged for speedy deletion, but non-notable comic is not a CSD. The given reason by Sputnikcccp was "non-notable. (the comic is cute though)". No vote. King of Hearts | (talk) 00:53, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Delete Speedy delete would have been useful but since it's not a valid CSD, delete using AfD seconded. Tokakeke 01:30, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable webcomic. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-17 02:19Z
• Delete as non-notable.--ragesoss 04:10, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as vanity advertising. Sycthos^Talk 04:52, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non notable comic and the link is only a comic strip from photobucket.com.--Dakota ~ ε 10:16, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I didn't know nn webcomic strips are encyclopedic. --Terence Ong 14:17, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all of the above. -- Dragonfiend 17:19, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The way the article says the comic's author's surname is "withheld for privacy reasons" is a dead giveaway that the article's author is, or is a personal friend of, the comic's author. A clear case of webcomic vanity. JIP | Talk 18:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nn. --Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 19:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.