Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:20, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kepco

Delete. Request for significance was removed without explanation. Non-notable company. discospinster 01:26, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:CORP and WP:SPAM --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is bad, even for SPAM. As short as it is, I still managed to find a factual error and bad grammar. Rklawton 01:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable private company. Dlyons493 Talk 01:32, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, article makes no claim that the subject meets WP:CORP, and it likely doesn't. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:03, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, article asserts no notability. JIP | Talk 06:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn company and spam. --Terence Ong 12:49, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. joturner 12:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. --HolyRomanEmperor 14:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable. _-M ^o P-_ 16:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. - Wezzo (talk) (ubx) 18:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn-company --Ugur Basak 21:32, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Latinus 23:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete promo spam. David Hoag 08:13, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.