Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KenyaTech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 18:05, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] KenyaTech

Fails WP:CORP and WP:WEB was created as an attack page since some of the comments on this page were removed from another article Mike _{(T C)} 05:37, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Withdrawn per NPOV rewrite, please close. Mike _{(T C)} 03:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Joe 05:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 06:47, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Henning Makholm 07:06, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - As nom. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 20:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep & rewrite notable scam artists. 15,000 google hits. Documented on TV news. Quite well-known within its rather dubious field - notorious, even. There's no reason they should escape exposure. This shouldn't be an attack page, but neither should this notable and sketchy business group be allowed to escape all notice just because such businesses prefer to fly under the radar. Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 23:35, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

If your willing to help me rewrite this with a NPOV then lets do it, i'll withdraw the nomination. But we have to be careful, everything must be documented exactly and be 100% proven from legit independent websites (ie kenyatechwatch is not independent of this article and is not a valid resource, but news articles are). Mike _{(T C)} 23:43, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Sure thing, will do. I'll rewrite sometime tonight or tomorrow. Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 01:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

• Pending the possible rewrite. If nothing emerges, other admins should feel free to close this. Johnleemk | Talk 15:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Per my nom, im withdrawing my withdrawal. nothing has been rewritten. Mike _{(T C)} 05:45, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.