Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendall yards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kendall yards

Deprodded. I'm in favour of keeping articles about all natural geography and geographical precincts (suburbs and municipalities), but this is a specific housing project, and could possibly considered as real estate advertising.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 00:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 01:15, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No assertion of notability. Apparently, the housing project hasn't even been built yet. It's hard to tell, because the article isn't written very clearly. --Hyperbole 01:49, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Comment They haven't broken ground, and it looks like they have some problems. From an article in today's paper [1]: "Spokane Mayor Dennis Hession on Monday announced the formation of a City Hall team to guide creation of a large housing and commercial development on the North Bank of the Spokane River. The team will be responsible for helping developer Marshall Chesrown obtain approval to build the first phase of the Kendall Yards project west of the Monroe Street Bridge." Add Crystal-Ballism to the nom. Fan1967 03:10, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - does not appear notable, looks like advertisement or (a now-removed section) likely copyright violation from here --Ajdz 05:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, possibly advertisement --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 05:40, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete looks like spam for a commercial developer. Just zis Guy you know? 11:16, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, spam, ad, nn. --Terence Ong 11:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, but will support re-creation once it actually exists. Lankiveil 12:52, 12 April 2006 (UTC).
• Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 16:16, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete; article doesn't assert its notability as opposed to any other redevelopment project. Actually, a merge to Spokane, Washington might be appropriate if this redevelopment is significant within the city. --Elkman - ^(talk) 19:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not quite an advertisment but not notable --Mason 22:31, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.