Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendal Choral Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. Herostratus 04:51, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kendal Choral Society

Very little context, and only 11 ghits. (|-- UlTiMuS ^{( U • T • C | M • E )} 21:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

What is a ghits? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.131.114.45 (talk • contribs) .

• Comment, it's a google hit. ColourBurst 22:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep The Google hits are pretty bad., but the hits that they do get look solid. They seem to be listed in the british national archive. I think this bears further investigation and some better assertion of notabiliy and references. Irongargoyle 22:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep, could do with some expansion and sources. JPD (talk) 11:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, context is not extensive, but descriptive and clear. The topic is encyclopedic and Google hits are a poor indication for subjects like this. I'll wikify it now. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 14:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Another weak keep For a performing group they produce very few Google and news hits, but I found a news item that details the history of the society, and I'd say this one goes in based on history not WP:MUSIC. ~ trialsanderrors 01:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.