Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith b white

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 14:11, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Keith b white

He is a businessman who is not particularly notable. -- Kjkolb 05:47, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, no assertion of notability. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 06:30, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Who??? Jwissick 06:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - Google 72 results, not noteworthy. I suspect vanity as well. -- Malo 07:04, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - nn, vanity. Why do these folk create entries for themselves but without capitalising their names in the titles? CLW 07:52, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. 83.70.223.222 08:06, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Lack of "notability" is not a criterion for deletion. But the capitalization needs to be fixed and the article needs to be wikified... -- Reinyday, 14:00, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes it is, unless I read CSD A7 incorrectly. -Splash^talk 14:35, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Correct, but CSD/A7 speedy requests are being turned down with the above argument (which isn't a Wikipedia policy - see link). Some clarification may help. Groeck 15:05, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn. I almost speedied it, but it crams so many damned assertions in, it'll burst open next time anyone edits it. -Splash^talk 14:35, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't think this is a speedy candidate due to the various claims of notibility... at least they are trying to assert them. Nothing this guy has done makes him more notable than hundreds of other managers at hundreds of other companies though. He graduated from college and he worked at various companies...--Isotope23 14:59, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Personally, I'd call it a speedy. This guy has had jobs, and has gotten degrees. So have lots of people. But I can see why the speedy may be controversial, so I didn't tag it. Friday (talk) 15:18, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete either per speedy/A7 or WP:BIO. Groeck 15:42, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I'd said "userfy" if it wasn't an anon. This guy may be nice, and may be liked by everyone he works with, but he fails the "average X" test. -- Antaeus Feldspar 16:48, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. Shauri 16:51, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn Amren ^(talk) 20:36, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• This b deleted, not notable. 142.104.36.199 00:04, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

I got auto-logged-out somehow when I tried to vote there. It's me. Hi. Lord Bob 00:04, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.