Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kat Shoob (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was why the hell was this pointless procedural nomination kept open this long KEEP. — Jul. 21, '06 [17:40] <freak|talk>

[edit] Kat Shoob

This article was previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kat Shoob over concerns regarding notability. This deletion was endorsed at DRV, but a new and different recreation was written in the meantime. An editor attempted to AfD this recreation, but did not properly complete the listing. I am doing so in order to clarify whether Ms. Shoob belongs. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 16:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete, per first nom. OSU80 17:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • This is not a substantially similar recreation, and is not speediable. I'd have to wiki-wifflebat any admin who speedied it -- this issue has been unresolved for two weeks now (thanks to a flaw in the listing), and needs to be properly resolved. Xoloz 17:27, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - notable in my opinion, more so than some of her fellow presenters who have articles. It was re-created and this nomination appears to be too similar to the last one. King rich 01:55, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Presenter on several nationally televised shows. --DarkAudit 01:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Presenter on several nationally televised shows, at least one of which is on the second biggest terrestrial, free-to-air, UK channel (ITV). -- GWO
• Keep It may be the worst show on terrestrial TV but presenting nearly every night on The Mint (game show) makes her notable. Keresaspa 13:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The first deletion months back was understandable as I created the article before understanding the rules, the second was not. She is on ITV1 along with other presenters who all have Wiki pages. There is no reason to single out this article when there are still pages for presenters from the same show as her who are less notable. If I never created her article all those months ago, no-one would mind a jot if her article appeared now. --Mr.bonus 13:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - When first deleted, Kat Shoob gave no Google hits, she now has over 1000, her own unofficial website and is presenting on ITV1. There is no doubt of her notablility.--Bobmills 13:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Definitely keep. There is no argument for deleting this page. More notable than many other people who have articles.--Lughguy 16:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - no arguement. I spent a lot of time on this article with some great additions from Mr.Bonus. It was deleted last time because she wasn't notable. Now she is as she has a job presenting the Mint. I have no idea why one person has said speedy delete as they don't even live in the UK so wouldn't know about the majority of UK presenters.SenorKristobbal 16:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• That is exactly what happened the 2nd time (out of 3). People who aren't even in this country trying to add their two-penneth. I think some people just like being a part of a deletion. --Mr.bonus 16:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I struck out my vote, and yes I was voting speedy based on the results from the last vote. I think you should both try to remember WP:CIVIL. I have a right to vote just like everyone else, regardless of my reasoning. A simple mistake that next time could properly be solved on my userpage talk where it belongs and not on an AFD project page. Thanks! OSU80 22:06, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

I've decided that the result is keep, let's end here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cola4 (talk • contribs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.