Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kansas City Shuffle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 01:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kansas City Shuffle

del neologism. `'mikka (t) 22:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Okay, so it was used in a movie; it's still a pointless neologism. -- Captain Disdain 07:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

// Even if it is Encyclopedia should include everything

• Strong Keep --Vergardio 01:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 21:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete this and merge any useful information (which would need to be rewritten) into the article on the film. BigHaz 00:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism used in only one particular movie. --Metropolitan90 02:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NEO. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Yomangani 12:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Interesting problem: there is a song by this name, and it has been used both in grifts and in music for a long time. If we're looking solely at the article, delete, as the article is incorrect (not a neologism) and trivial (a joke from a movie). No G4 prejudice against a proper article in the future. Geogre 12:32, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Is there much that can be said about it other than that it is a jazz song first recorded by Bennie Moten's Kansas City Orchestra on 1926-12-13? Uncle G 14:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, not by me. :-) I don't want to jinx anyone else, though. After all, there is a mania for song articles, and this song, at least, has some cultural resonance -- more than most of the disposable ditties produced by pop tarts these days. Geogre 17:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.