Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jural Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. I've discounted those who've made arguments that no longer apply (dicdef, copyvio) after several users' excellent work cleaning up this article. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 07:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jural Society

Looks like a list of tests with a stub on top and a Wiktionary template at the bottom. Nowhere close to a good article. Delete. Georgia guy 01:14, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

• Transwiki to Wiktionary and delete. Dicdef. ~MDD4696 01:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep pending an expansion beyond mere definition. There seems to be a jural society movement on the US's West Coast (and elsewhere?) that could/should be included in the entry. - Jaysus Chris 01:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - I'm working on a rewrite but will not finish today. This is a viable entry. Interesting topic. It will be more than a dicdef when finished. If you're interested in doing more than voting, feel free to add to it. I'm done for today.- Jaysus Chris 02:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki per MDD, this is just a fat dicdef. Ruby 01:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Trakswiki per above. --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 03:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki and Cleanup, unless article can be expanded with notable information. -Rebelguys2 04:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

*Transwiki useful info and Keep this, there's a citation about something that actually happened to them. This could be a very useful article with more research. Grandmasterka 05:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

• Transwiki the definition and keep. The article is a stub, but can be expanded.--Adam ^(talk) 14:03, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the definition! It's a copyvio!!!!! User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki and Cleanup It's possible to expand on this page. Give it time. Rayisthechosenone 22:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: As currently reformulated, this is no longer suitable for transwiki to Wiktionary, since it's now about a particular organization rather than a dicdef. Whether it is kept or deleted should now be based on the degree of notability of this organization, of which I'm not certain myself. *Dan T.* 16:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. "Jural Society" (apparently synonomous with "Jural Society of the State of Washington") gets only ~6,000 Google hits, but several are new stories; this organization seems slightly notable.--ragesoss 06:04, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.