Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jurabib

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Yanksox 15:08, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jurabib

Free sotware, no evidence of notability. --Peta 23:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Individual LaTeX package? Delete, unless we get to make articles about babel, url/hyperref and especially natbib... which doesn't seem likely! We don't really need to document the entire CTAN, and I don't think this thing would ever grow beyond what it is now. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 12:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Den fjättrade ankan 13:00, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • (Note: This user is also the primary author of the article.) Pardon me for being curious, but what in your opinion would be the reason to keep this article? I fail to see how this qualifies under WP:SOFTWARE, aside of "included in a major operating system distribution" (I type in "locate jurabib.sty" in my Debian machine and bang, there it is), but this is not a separate package with a high rank, and it's just an infinitesimal part of a huge package called tetex-extra, and teTeX has an article (well, at least a redirect). --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 08:34, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no claim of notability made. Themindset 04:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.