Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumba

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jumba

ATTENTION! If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a ballot, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads. You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! Note: Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username|UTC timestamp [optional]}}

Modest, midsize company fails WP:CORP. Take a look at the section on the chronology of their advertising catch phrases. Wikipedia is not an advertising service. --Xrblsnggt 17:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, because the subject fails wp:corp, as noted above. Picaroon9288|ta co 18:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. 74.119.26.14 20:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for lack of an assertion of reasonable notability. —xyzzy_n 14:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Don't Delete Aussiepete is not a member of Jumba Staff, neither are any of the other people who have contributed to thos page. More at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jumba —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.7.176.133 (talk • contribs) .
• Don't Delete The catch phrases section is there simply for historical reasons. This company has been mentioned in various publications including the Australian Personal Computer magazine (this months issue and last months) under the topic of Joomla!. The jumba community has created this page because we believe that it is an important resource to the whole hosting community.--Ioannisjt 04:31, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

— Possible single purpose account: Ioannisjt (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic. —xyzzy_n 10:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• • ‘Mentioned’ is not enough. —xyzzy_n 10:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Don't Delete Agree with --Ioannisjt. Jumba does not appear to be advertising any products. --BradyBaldwin 15:01, 04 August 2006 (UTC).

— Possible single purpose account: BradyBaldwin (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic. —xyzzy_n 10:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Don't Delete I agree with Ioannisjt also. 59.167.132.247
• Don't Delete, this was written by a community of people who belong to the Jumba forums, there has been a lot of hard work put into this. --GavLewis 07:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

— Possible single purpose account: GavLewis (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic. —xyzzy_n 10:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Geez, you people make up so many excuses to delete something that you really don't care about do you? --GavLewis 11:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - insufficient evidence of meeting WP:CORP. BlueValour 04:05, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Please Check the Media release section, I believe that this shall now make this page conform with the WP:CORP rules. --GavLewis 04:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
  • So it hosted a website which was the main exhibit of a badly researched TV report on a well-known show and then someone else said so. This is too trivial, imho. —xyzzy_n 13:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

• Is this article hurting anyone? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.167.132.247 (talk • contribs) .

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.