Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Barendse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 22:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Julian Barendse

Delete Subject not notable, previous articles have been biased and highly POV about a student politician. Similar situation to Stephen Luntz, Alex White and Scott Crawford--2006BC 21:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This article was previously nominated for deletion in May 2005, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Julian Barendse. The result there was keep. Angr/talk 12:23, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of list of Australia-related deletions. Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Barendse is/was? president of a national political organisation, none of the above were. In any event I oppose the romoval of active politicians on the grounds of non-notability. Xtra 02:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment I have no problem with Julian, indeed one of my concerns is that the article is a vehicle for defaming him by adversaries. Be that as it may he is no more notable than the National President of Labor Students whoever that is. His term expires in a few months anyway. --2006BC 05:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete More notable than the others, but not by much. --kingboyk 02:51, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep seems like a notable enough political figure. JoshuaZ 03:52, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete for similar reasons as Kingboyk above. -- Ian ≡ talk 05:02, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Student politician, not notable. No doubt he'll be in Who's Who one day. DarrenRay 14:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 00:29, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, student politician with no other notaibility. Stifle 00:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, defamed daily. Not a notable hack.--Schgooda 12:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.