Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan R. Perales

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:36, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Juan R. Perales

Non-notable, vanity page. Delete. --DrTorstenHenning 09:39, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

It's a interesting article about an spanish celebrity. It's horrible this anglosaxon political of deletion.

Comment. In case that is directed at me: I am neither anglo nor saxon. And Wikipedia welcomes articles about notable people from all over the world. --DrTorstenHenning 12:06, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

• Great big Anglo-Saxon delete for this vanity page about a nn person. Sadly can't speedy, as contains assertions of notability, albeit made-up ones. Proto t c 10:21, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, a search on Spanish Google for his name yields a massive 2 hits. Also, I doubt a town of 1000 towers each 1000 meter high would escape my attention if it existed. As far as I know, such a town does not exist. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:07, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

- Answer : It's a great project about a new kind of city. About the spanish Google, maybe da ya believe that google is the holy bible?

- Juan R. Perales says to the great-removers: " I've decided to remove this page, I think you are not ready for real information, you all only want to satisfy your ego's. You can be now happiness, but it's a pity you lack of sense of humour and your arrogance. I'll add this information in other more democratic enciclopedia.

Good Bye "

Juan, we are so democratic that we want to give more people the chance to vote. And therefore we will keep reverting any blanking of the page until this vote is properly concluded. --DrTorstenHenning 13:02, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

• This "yello nerd" says Delete. Arrogant vanity. android79 12:44, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete until "They are the most spanish freakies you've ever seen" are grounds for notability (from article talk page). Alf 13:13, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Google doesn't mention this city of 1000 towers, 1km high, so I thought I'd check the Bible since that's suggested as a source. And do you know, that doesn't mention it either? Delete.

Forgot to sign. Tonywalton  | Talk 13:28, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

BJAODN, per The wub Tonywalton  | Talk 15:36, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

• BJAODN. the wub "?/!" 15:25, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• DELETE no sólo qué no es una persona notable, es un loco. Dottore So 16:47, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

• On behalf of the "CLEANUP-FORCE", this great-remover says Delete. Finally, I can now be happiness...Karmafist 19:53, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Comment If this does go to BJAODN, please can it go with the "yello nerd" attack included, now deleted by Zoe? I don't want to start a revert war, but without that it loses some piquancy. Tonywalton  | Talk
  • Yeah, it's a lot funnier with that included. (Plus my vote doesn't make sense without it...) Don't forget the talk page, either. android79 21:12, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I am not ready for real information. Sdedeo 21:59, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Strong delete Should be speedied as hoax. Johntex 23:47, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unverified vanity. --Etacar11 00:29, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
• I'd like to see a photo of the thousand towers. I'd like to have the money it would cost to create it. I'd like to vote Delete as unverifiable. One out of three is probably all I'll get. --WCFrancis 01:10, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, unverifiable, non-notable, etc. maybe even vanity. --23:27, August 31, 2005 (UTC)

Juan R. perales says to everyone : A sign of that's a so good article it's the controversy a interesting discussion about it. I think most of the peploe who's written here really they've enjoyed the article and the interesting discussion and it's the acid test of that type articles about curious and unclassifiable people can enrich this great enciclopaedia.

• Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. We can only report information that's available elsewhere. Until someone can prove this project is in the planning or actually exists we can't accept an article about it. Likewise, with Juan himself: we need sources that say he's an artist. And 1000 meter towers would reach 1km into the sky. To my knowledge it's impossible to build that high. Again we need sources to back up your claim. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:13, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
• I think you'll find that "controversy" implies "contra", Juan. I don't see anybody except you putting forward any viewpoint opposite to "delete". Try [1]] Tonywalton  | Talk 12:45, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.