Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Levine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 17:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Josh Levine

Apparent vanity page Rholton 23:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Actually, he Googles pretty well. I was skeptical until I saw that he really does exhibit with legitimate galleries and seems to be an artist of some notability. wikipediatrix 23:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems to have some art notability. However, there are a couple of other Josh Levines including an author and businessman (the founder of E-trade) who may warrant articles in their own right so a disambiguation page might be necessary. Capitalistroadster 00:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity article. Does not google pretty well, almost all of the first two pages of hits are for other Josh Levines. KleenupKrew 03:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Somewhat notable in the arts. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 04:51, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The "Josh Levines" that the Google search quoted here throws up is not this person. Vanity. Dr Zak 14:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BLP and Dr. Zak. I'm probably also going to AFD all those other articles linked from his page, apparent walled garden. Stifle (talk) 14:44, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I guess. This is strange, though - his main claim to fame seems to be the garbasail, which is in itself apparently cruft even if it is interesting. Just zis Guy you know? 16:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BIO The JPS ^{talk to me} 21:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. TheMadBaron 21:27, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete, the google hits are for others of the name, and there's been a bunch of vanity articles about his 'projects' have also been created. Proto||type 11:40, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.