Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Welch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete as {{nn-bio}}. Stifle 23:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jon Welch

NN, vanity. Initially tagged as speedy, but page creator removed the tag. Listing here now. See also AfD-Richard 'the Lionheart' Morris, page created by same editor. --Fang Aili ^說嗎? 19:13, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Not only a student politician, but also entered the Caffe Nero Young Barrista of the Year 2006 competition.
• Keep Jon Welch is a legend, and will be famous!!!!
• Keep Jon Welch and Richard Morris are both student politicans who are emerging, their articles should stay. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.36.107.54 (talk • contribs).
• Keep Support politics, dont create a dictatorship. politicians should remain on here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.36.107.54 (talk • contribs).
• Keep He has made a very valuable contribution to the Guild and is generally considered the best ever Independent chair.81.132.155.19 22:36, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable biographies for the pair of student politicians, WP:BIO refers.  (aeropagitica)  19:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete just like the Morris article above. Sandstein 19:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC
• Delete nn bio, original research, vanity Bucketsofg 20:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Just like Morris. Fan1967 20:25, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Gu 20:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and it's a CSD A7 speedy candidate. David | Talk 21:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, about as notable as Morris. Nothing to show that the subject meets WP:BIO. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:48, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn-bio. Montco 02:47, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, and I agree with dbiv that this really ought to be an A7 candidate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:05, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Note The Policy on Vanity Articles states that; Only those articles where there is no remotely plausible assertion of notability should be considered for Wikipedia:Speedy deletion. Therefore this is not a CSD A7

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.