Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Weston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete - closed AfD had been mistakenly re-opened. -- RHaworth 06:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] John_Weston

Delete ..Found to be biast. John Weston wrote it himself, thus spinning it to make it look like the Conservitives are better than the liberals Forgotten 06:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:42, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] John Weston

Not notable, vanity ad. Ryan Delaney ^talk 19:10, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 19:11, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Deleteper nom.Obina 20:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. If he wins a seat this page isn't even a good start because there's so much posturing there... Musser 06:18, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.