Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Allee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete, with or without copyvio concerns. android79 15:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] John Allee
Looks like a vanity page, written by John Allee himself. See also http://churchofsatan.org/gallery.html . "Critical acclaim" for a US movie that is not in IMDB? (But if somebody can find facts , such as the size of Allee's community, that would be different. Austrian 00:14, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Delete -- Obviously a vanity page, however if someone took the time to clean it up a bit and add some more factual info I'd be willing to change my vote.--Isotope23 00:23, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Copyvio in fact. (Although since its author was user:Johnallee, who knows.) Flowerparty 00:50, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Even if it's the author copying his own material over, it's a copyvio without confirmed permission, if the original material was not released by GFDL or public domain. Copyright adheres without any statement of copyright, and copyrighted material can only be here if it is first declared free. Geogre 01:57, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio. Capitalistroadster 01:42, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Delete It is possible that this guy is notable outside of Satanic circles (references to him to appear on a lot of free homepages). Needs more factual info. 68.20.28.234 02:05, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete NN Marcus22 10:04, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn. Dottore So 19:21, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable. CHAIRBOY (☎) 20:12, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Copyvio, therefore delete. However, were the copyvio not an issue, I would have said weak keep, because wikipedia is not paper and it has some merits. --Jacqui M Schedler 16:12, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
