Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer wiss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 12:08, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jennifer wiss

Not notable person. Ashenai 10:03, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

• Why? It is about the main person in the UK dealing with this type of litigation, no less notable than you surely?

I am also non-notable, which is why there's no article on me. :)

You claim she is "well known", and "the main person in the UK dealing with this type of litigation", yet Google is very silent on her. +

Please understand that this isn't meant to be any sort of personal criticism; just trying to keep Wikipedia encyclopedic. I mean no harm, and no offense. Cheers. :) --Ashenai 10:16, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable. utcursch | talk 10:14, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - just like Daddy's page: nn, vanity. Is she even less notable than her papa, seeing as she doesn't have a capital W in her surname? CLW 12:07, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Ha! I couldn't work out how to fix the capital afterwards (sarcasm??). Thanks for the message Ashenai, have made my user page now! So delete away!

• • Do I take it this is the author's comment above? Could go Speedy as author's request then.--Isotope23 21:01, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Same IP, in any case. The comment came just after I left her a note welcoming her and explaining user pages on her talk page, so I'm pretty sure it'd be OK to speedy, yep. --Ashenai (talk) 21:05, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. nn. -- DS1953 03:13, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. "Associate Law Lecturer" would not meet the professor test of WP:PROF, and being a lawyer specializing in a particular tye of case is, well, not notable. MCB 22:44, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as all above, plus the Ms Wiss now has indeed copied this to her user page, as Baby Jenga. No harm done, methinks. Budgiekiller 18:03, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.