Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Krum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. — JIP | Talk 22:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jennifer Krum

Moved to afd from csd (nn-bio). I'm leaning towards Keep, myself.-- Syrthiss 15:49, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep provided more information is supplied. Doesn't seem nn-bio now. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 15:54, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

  Comment: If an article is not nn-bio, it means it shouldn't be speedily deleted. No comment about whether it should be slowly deleted though. Stifle 02:09, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete she was on Howard Stern and posed in playboy. All the google hits I get about either her or Miss Amputee are fan sites of Howard Stern. Does this make her notable enough to have an article? --Pboyd04 16:21, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Not in my opinion. --Syrthiss 16:22, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Can you clarify your stance? You said "keep" initially but this implies you think it should be deleted. howcheng {chat} 20:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
      • I have been trying to avoid actually participating in afd discussions that I brought myself, but if you are tied for consensus count my vote as Delete. ie I was in the delete camp, but leaning towards keep because she was verifyable if not nessecarily notable --Syrthiss 20:15, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Pablo-flores. --King of All the Franks 16:25, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Being the first to do something seems notable to me.... Jcuk 17:28, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Jcuk is a "member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians"--Quarl 21:13, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
    • WTF has that got to do with anything?! I'll thank you not to put sarky irrelelvant snipes after my comments. Jcuk 22:15, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak delete. I'm the first user whose username starts with Q to vote to delete this article. "Not nn-bio" just means it doesn't meet criteria for speedy deletion; not that it doesn't meet criteria for deletion. --Quarl 21:13, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete due to lack of notability. In addition, the attraction here is pure side show. If this woman weren't disabled, this would have been a speedy. Jtmichcock 00:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Strong delete. It isn't an nn-bio because it has an assertion of notability. However, I don't see at all how she passes WP:BIO. Stifle 02:09, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.