Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jeg

Neologism and dict def. Unverified. eaolson 03:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 04:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NEO, WP:NOT Urban Dictionary, and quite frankly, I don't know if they'd want this either. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete So not fetch. Danny Lilithborne 05:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not the Urban Dictionary --Xrblsnggt 06:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NFT. The creator probably invented it seconds before writing the article. JIP | Talk 09:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. — Adrian Lamo ·· 09:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Richardcavell 23:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment It is a widely used word in Norway and Denmark. :-) Medico80 13:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.