Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Lebowski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was MERGE to The Big Lebowski. -Splash^talk 23:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jeff Lebowski

This material covered sufficiently at The Big Lebowski; this page not required Dyslexic agnostic 07:25, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

• Merge of course Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 08:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Nothing worth merging. ' ^{I can't click that! (Edits!)} 11:23, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect. If there's nothing worth merging, just a redirect from the main character to the film is still useful. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:51, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Split into two articles: Jeff Lebowski (dude) Jeff Lebowski (millionaire) and make this article a dismbig page. The dude abides. (just kidding...vote: Merge. -- MisterHand 14:43, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge TheRingess 14:45, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect. JGF Wilks 15:01, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Note to closing admin. This is this user's 7th edit. --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 18:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

What's the problem with that? I know the film, I've looked at the pages, I've been reading the wide ranging advice and comment pages. I got the impression the Wiki community wants people to get involved, so why have you needed to make this comment? I'm not offended, but genuinely wondering what's going on. JGF Wilks 18:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

No problem at all, but it can potentially be a sign of a sock puppet. See WP:SOCK for more info. I don't think Eliezer intended any accusation, however. --DavidConrad 02:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect with The Big Lebowski. Fagstein 17:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect as above. Dan 18:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect as above. MNJosh 15:05, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to The Big Lebowski. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-03 21:35Z
• Redirect. Poorly written, anti-drug, anti-Lebowski. "He drives a used car"?? The movie doesn't really cover the origin of The Dude's car.

BabuBhatt 00:11, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect as above. Essexmutant 13:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect; everyone can then merge content from the history. - Liberatore(T) 17:24, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• There's no reason for the Jeffrey Lebowski article to be deleted. It's a free-source encyclopedia, and I'm all about having information pertaining to the dude on the internet for all to see. (unsigned by 24.186.80.192 20:30, 8 January 2006)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.