Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanie Greene

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jeanie Greene, Mary Called Jeanie Greene, Joa-Bim

Also looking to delete related articles Mary Called Jeanie Greene and Joa-Bim. Obscure Canadian singer, 122 unique G-hits [1] - and even that much is fouled by a woman by the same name who's an Alaskan First Nations activist - who came out with only one album, which the article itself says failed to gain airplay or sales, and so fails WP:MUSIC by a country mile. The other two articles are the album and its lead track, respectively. All three articles are scanty even for stubs, and haven't been expanded upon a month and a half after creation. RGTraynor 06:44, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. The record was on Elektra Records, a major label. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all three articles. Unfortunately the artist, album and single are just another example of a one-nohit-wonder. fails WP:MUSIC by a long way per RGTraynor - Peripitus (Talk) 07:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 08:40, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete All Elektra or no, However, like its parent album Mary Called Jeanie Greene and Greene herself, it failed to make any commercial or airplay headway pretty much sums it up. Even major record labels make mistakes. — NMChico24 11:18, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all three Fails WP:MUSIC as non notable. Thε Halo ^Θ 11:27, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all Eusebeus 13:05, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all — per nom & NMChico24 --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 16:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete There's a reason WP:MUSIC requires two albums from a recognized label. Many performers manage one, like this, that sinks into oblivion. Fan-1967 17:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.