Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Cranford Teague

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jason Cranford Teague

Delete Vanity page per WP:VAIN. See [1] for Jcranfordteague's suggestion about why to create articles like this. RossPatterson 16:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup. Yes, the article reads "blowhard", but: website rates Alexa #213,254. Latest book is in Amazon's Top 100K (#92,418), fairly notable for a non-fiction book. Tapped as an expert by Tech TV, and his clientele (though I suspect it's a bit glossed over) does also imply notability.--み使い Mitsukai 16:40, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep notable Where ^(talk) 18:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete a 213,254 alexa rating, and a book in Amazon top 100 000, does not point to notability, but WP:HOLE. Eivind 23:35, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep some signs of notability demonstrate that the article should be kept, even if not all areas qualify. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 01:07, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep; apparently meets notability standard for published authors. Monicasdude 04:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.