Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarrod Cochran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jarrod Cochran

Non-notable/vanity KHM03 (talk) 01:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, nn bio. 49 Google hits. Royboycrashfan 01:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn/vanity. dbtfz^talk 01:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Fishhead64 02:08, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.Montco 03:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and while were at it is the organization he is associated with CrossLeft notable at all? Google hits are not favorable. JoshuaZ 03:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 05:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn + vanity. Mikker ^(...) 05:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per the nominations, not really notable. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 08:11, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Being a Christian minister is not enough notability for a Wikipedia article.
• Delete per nom. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 16:38, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete just a self-article. Weatherman90 16:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Please Delete Though I am truly flattered to be on Wikipedia, I would rather it be due to an honest popularity of my sermons and writings and not by a friend with good intentions. My apologies to Wikipedia. Jc123 19:08, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.