Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamia Hamdard Alumni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge with Jamia Hamdard. Done. Ifnord 14:33, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jamia Hamdard Alumni

This is a technical nomination. Whoever created this AfD didn't go through the section step, so I have done so. If the AfD nominator does end up editing this page, feel free to cross out my nomination and add your reasons. Dark Shikari 14:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 16:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, alumni groups are not inherently important and there is no evidence of third-party interest. Kappa 07:16, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Alumni groups are not inherently important? Some have proved to be very powerful. Anyway, I think what matters is whether or not this one is notable. --HResearcher 11:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

"Not inherently" is different from "inherently not" :) Kappa 12:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

LOL. Good one! Thanks for pointing it out. :) --HResearcher 14:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete unless notability can be proven. --HResearcher 11:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Jamia Hamdard --RMHED 14:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per RMHED's suggestion. --HResearcher 18:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per RMHED's suggestion. utcursch | talk 12:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.