Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade on neighbours

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 20:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jade on neighbours

Non-notable bit of fan cruft. -- RHaworth 15:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Oh no ya don't. AdamBiswanger1 15:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Total fancruft, possibly verifiable, but not notable. --Mnemeson 16:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unencyclopedic. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Don't Delete There are far less notable entries on Wikipedia than this one. It'll hardly become notable if it's deleted. The "unencyclopedic" entry is the only real valid point here, and yet this could be changed with a cleanup - many likewise events are noted on Wikipedia, numerous of them on celebrity biographies.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.143.246.31 (talk • contribs).

*Don't Delete (duplicate !vote by 155.143.246.31) "Oh no ya don't"? What is this supposed to mean? This comment seems vindictive and/or malicious.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.143.246.31 (talk • contribs).

• Comment - hi there, 155.143.246.31. Wikipedia is a place to document things that are notable, not a place to put things in order to make them well enough known that they are notable. Please read our guidelines on WP:Notability, and WP:NOT to see what should and shouldn't go in. --Mnemeson 14:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.