Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Klein

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep -- Joolz 23:34, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jacob Klein

Tagged as nn-bio (CSD A7). Whilst being a prof isn't an assertion of notability, being Head of a Laboratory possibly is. Needs massive work, but that doesn't make it a speedy. No vote from me, but I found this. -Splash 03:34, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep He is a notable researcher who deserves a longer article. --Apyule 06:20, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: is there any criteria for determining the notability of college professors? I've come across quite a few that are merely average, if that (no comment on this one). Is being a college professor inherently notable? Given the number of college professors in the world, I don't think it would be possible to maintain that many articles. -- Kjkolb 11:02, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Being the head of a research department at Oxford University makes one notable. If cleanup is needed, I recommend a request being send to the cleanup taskforce or a suitable wikiproject. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:22, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep stub and request expansion. He wouldn't have been where he is if he weren't notable in his field. Tupsharru 16:54, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Done some improvements. Alf ^melmac 20:01, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Note: someone who knows better than me should check "What links here" on the article. Alf ^melmac 20:07, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

These links obviously refer to one or two other persons of the same name. This article should probably be moved to Jacob Klein (chemist) eventually. Tupsharru 20:22, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, but author should add references to support notability claim.---CH (talk) 04:22, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.