Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack shit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:08, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jack shit

Dictionary definition plus nonsensical original ideas. WP:WINAD and WP:NOR. Erik the Rude 00:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I was new page patrolling and about to do the same. SorryGuy 00:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Dictionary definition. Sarahgal 00:57, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NOT a dictionary:

A usage guide or slang and idiom guide. Wikipedia is not in the business of saying how words, idioms, etc. should be used. We aren't teaching people how to talk like a Cockney chimney-sweep. However, it may be important in the context of an encyclopedia article to describe just how a word is used to distinguish among similar, easily confused ideas, as in nation or freedom. In some special cases an article about an essential piece of slang may be appropriate. --Jersey Devil 01:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as original research about a dicdef. Kevin 01:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Slang dic def, POV. Ande B 01:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It was just created today, of course it's bad. Also consider a transwiki to Wiktionary. Armedblowfish 02:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC) changed vote to merge and redirect (see below). Armedblowfish 17:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, slang. --Terence Ong 03:59, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or transwiki if others agree. Thetruthbelow^(talk) 04:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 04:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Move This is actually a pretty good article on a definition. Move to wikitionary. jbolden1517^Talk 04:36, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- policy is very clear. Thanks, Jersey Devil. Reyk _YO! 05:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and no transwiki. This crap isn't worthy of Wiktionary, IMHO. Maybe for urbandic. M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 05:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Actually, it is quite idiomatic, and hence fine for Wiktionary, but it's already there. --Rory096 20:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete – if Wiktionary want it they can have it, but I doubt they do – Gurch 07:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki, if keep isn't on the cards. A well known phrase. -- 9cds^(talk) 14:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and no transwiki, if wiktionary users want this article they're better off creating a new one. Captainj 20:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This term should mabye redirect to a page on street slang, but it is not a notable enough term. No citations, OR interpretation of unoffical terms. HighInBC 16:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• On the contrary, there are two external links, one of which is a reliable source (though they definitely don't cover everything in the article). However, I change my vote to merge and redirect to List of profanities. Armedblowfish 17:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete content, redirect to bullshit. ~ trialsanderrors 19:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.