Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Eggar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. I see no assertion of notability here. The organisation he is a CEO of does not seem especially notable, and that is as close as it gets. --Sam Blanning(talk) 00:57, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Jack Eggar
Created by an editor whose other edits include removing the unaccredited status from a couple of Southern Baptist colleges, suspected as a Gastrich sock by at least two admins, subject of this article scores under 500 Googles, has no apparent claim to notability (a book published this year - unless it was the Dav Vinci Code that one book is unlikely to be sufficient). Creator's neutrality is indicated by the fact that, although he lists Eggar's degrees, he quite forgot to mention that they come from unaccredited institutions. I call this Gastroturfing. Just zis Guy you know? 21:59, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks completely non-notable, unimportant, and insignificant. Brian G. Crawford 23:02, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable person, due to being a published author scholar and President/CEO of a major organization. --Please, do 00:33, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Creator has been blocked as a Gastrich sock, and I'm about to block Please, do, who is another Gastrich sock. Jason, don't you have books to sell or souls to save or something? KillerChihuahua?!? 00:43, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete unless article is updated to prove importance. Arbusto 00:48, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Criteria #5 Banned user. Pages created by banned users while they were banned. See: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion for details. Arbusto 00:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
