Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intoonfada
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Redirect to Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy. (aeropagitica) 13:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Intoonfada
A neologism for the recent cartoon controversy. I brought it here because the links certify some notability, but I don't think this is anywhere near common enough to warrant its own article. Google is inconclusive to me. Delete. Grandmasterka 16:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
*Delete A nickname that one blog used once is not enought for an article here. Bertilvidet 17:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect, of course. I didnt think of that option, thats no big deal! Bertilvidet 20:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete , this "article" belittles the controversy... also per Bertilvidet's reasoning. Netscott 18:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect (no merge) to Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy. Redirects are cheap. — TheKMantalk 16:08, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and then redirect per above. Just zis Guy you know? 16:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect An article consisting of a nickname for an event isn't required and isn't useful for researchers, who would probably prefer to read about the event in detail. (aeropagitica) 17:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy, don't merge. JIP | Talk 17:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect. Hynca-Hooley 19:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect , although I wouldn't mind outright deletion. Cyde Weys 21:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete: I love the name, but it's a neologism. Might have a place in BJAODN. Peter Grey 08:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
