This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Paul August☎ 23:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
Non notable neologism. No evidence of widespread usage. 585 google hits. By comparison, the neologism glomp (also up for vfd right now) gets 1.4 million google hits. Gamaliel 20:04, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
delete self-admitted neologism, outside the scope of wp. — brighterorange (talk) 20:36, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
Delete Non-notable. Amren(talk) 20:50, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.