Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Solidarity Fast for Darfur
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] International Solidarity Fast for Darfur
Seems like a non-notable protest, but I am not sure. I am remaining out of the discussion for now. Andrew Levine 00:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete This refers to what could be an important event, but right now the article works as a message board to announce something about the future. It's worthy for a blog or newspaper but not for an encyclopedia, at least not yet, and not as a stand alone article. Interlingua talk email 04:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete per above. --69.236.160.1 06:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)- Delete fails WP:V and I'm guessing WP:VAIN as well. WilyD 12:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete The only way something like this (which has yet to occur) could be notable is if it were already receiving significant media attention. Zero Google News hits, and only 70 unique Google hits indicate that this is not the case. -Elmer Clark 21:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- I have completely re-written the article to avoid the problems listed above. I suspect this event will gather more media attention as it nears, and I would draw your attention to the famous persons taking part. This event will almost certainly be notable, and (if it is not too vain of me) I believe the article as it stands is worthy of a Keep. LukeSurl 22:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This article may gather more media attention and may indeed be worthy. It's still too speculative for inclusion at this point. The best course may actually be userfy for now. If the event pans out, this revised text will be easily edited into a worthy article. Erechtheus 23:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.