Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interactive Multimedia Culture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete — FireFox ^(talk) _{19:02, 28 August 2006}

[edit] Interactive Multimedia Culture

Semicomprehensible semi-POV/OR essay. ~~ N (t/c) 00:17, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. –NeoChaosX (talk | contribs) 00:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete What he said - Richfife 02:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The article is written in a POV style. This leads us to the impression of originality of thought which Wikipedia is not. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 02:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Exactly. Leuko 02:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but needs a rewrite. kc4 - the Server Monkey Enforcer 03:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a POV/OR essay. It looks almost like a term paper. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 04:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Pretty useless in any way I can think of - who would even want to rewrite something like that? Much easier from scratch if ever needed. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 22:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Its not only pointless but it also needs to be cleaned up. Tarret 01:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• An important Essay on emerging discourses across the cybercommunity. This is not an original thought, as some claim, but a statement of certain facts about the future. I will wait for others to share their thoughts before I decide how to vote, but perhaps the author should publish this. Allon FambrizziAllon Fambrizzi
• Delete. Interesting but better suited for a magazine. Plinth molecular gathered 18:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.