Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinity (Marvel Comics)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 19:14, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Infinity (Marvel Comics)
Nonsense, probably original research, orphan article Mecanismo | Talk 18:10, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. This is a real character, and is mentioned elsewhere in Wikipedia (eg. in Eternity (comics) and Galactus). It is only orphaned for lack of wikilinks. However, it does seem, on my superficial search, that this character is only mentioned in the comics en passant and does not really appear anywhere. If such is the case, it should be merged into Eternity (comics). But this should be determined by someone more knowledgeable. JoaoRicardo 20:26, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. It's a good stub, it looks like there's just not enough canon information on the character yet to expand it beyond a stub. (I've improved it a bit.) -- stillnotelf has a talk page 21:46, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, as he is a real Marvel character. Carioca 00:46, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Noms, please check before nominating. -- JJay 22:29, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- JJay, please do some research before you cast your vote. In this case, I direct your attention to the article's version before my submittion. --Mecanismo | Talk 23:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- You may have acted in good faith. But I think you could have confirmed it yourself. The link to Marvel Comics was there. -- JJay 23:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
