Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indoeuropean, Turks and Finno-Ugrians in Europe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 07:36, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Indoeuropean, Turks and Finno-Ugrians in Europe
dubious POV PatGallacher 18:23, 2005 Jun 10 (UTC)
I will explain my reasons for calling for 'delete a bit further:- 1. This is a version of the Nostratic language theories, which is encyclopedic, but the article notes correctly that these theories are highly controversia. 2. This is a POV peddling of one version of the Nostratic theory. 3. It doesn't even argue its case very well, it's a bit of a ramble. PatGallacher 18:31, 2005 Jun 10 (UTC)
- Delete. See also Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Graphic-analytical method, by the same author. - Mustafaa 20:03, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, seems to be entirely speculative and probably total nonsense. Martg76 23:36, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a report of anything. --Wetman 23:49, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete original research. JamesBurns 02:58, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete patently nonsensical original research. --Angr/tɔk tə mi 06:57, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Merge (any salvagable NPOV content) into the Eurasiatic languages article, as it seems to address the same basic theory - minus the angle about Noah's arc and Mt. Arat. Blackcats 07:13, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Total nonsense. --Jyril 21:55, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
