Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Your Ear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Luna Santin 20:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] In Your Ear

In Your Ear (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

No assertion of notability, appears to fail WP:CORP. Prod was removed for ill-founded reasons. shotwell 18:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, non-notable. Jayden54 20:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, Quite notable. Vampyragurl 20:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Can you provide some references for its notability? What makes this music store different from other music stores? The article doesn't really provide any information on this. Jayden54 21:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. No indication of meeting WP:CORP or another notability standard. Sandstein 23:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as not notable. On a side note, I only found this AfD after seeing this revert. Maybe somebody should let Vampyragurl know who Jimbo is...made me laugh. ;-) -- AuburnPilot^talk 02:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Calling JW a vandal is pretty good, though. Chick Bowen 06:59, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - nn. Really, Jimmy Wales isn't a vandal, and I'm pretty sure he doesn't make bad faith noms (well, not under that username anyways) -- Tawker 03:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Naconkantari 03:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.