Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Caena Domini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was boldly redirected. GRBerry 02:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] In Caena Domini

Misspelling. Correct spelling is In Coena Domini. (Furthermore, see comment by User:Fastifex in Talk:In Coena Domini.) — Itai (talk) 15:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect - you don't need to use AFD for this, just be bold and redirect the mispelling to the correct article. exolon 16:22, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm generally pro-redirects - but with only 268 Google results, for the phrase, most of which are irrelevant, this might better be deleted. — Itai (talk) 16:40, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
    • If one editor made the spelling error and was so convinced of it that xe began a duplicate article on the subject, then other editors will do so again in the future. Redirects stop the continual cycle of creation and deletion of duplicate articles at mis-spellings. Uncle G 17:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Redirect as plausible typo. --Storkk 14:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.