Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ileana Snyder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 10:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ileana Snyder, Nicholas Snyder, Alexandra Snyder, Constanza Snyder

subject is 105th in line to the British throne, no other appernt claims to notability. I also nominate her children Nicholas Snyder, Alexandra Snyder, Constanza Snyder Ohconfucius 03:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy redirect them all to Line of succession to the British Throne.--Peta 03:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all Non-notable. Please see my comments for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulf Bauscher. — NMChico24 04:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Wryspy 04:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 11:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless somebody comes up with another claim to notability. RedRollerskate 13:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Delete or redirect as mentioned above. If they do something, then they deserve an article. StuffOfInterest 13:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Line of succession to the British Throne, for everybody under #100 in line with no independent claim of notability. NawlinWiki 14:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per NawlinkWiki.- Aksi_great (talk - review me) 14:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect all to Line of succession to the British throne, no claim of notability. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 21:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as previous, if 39th is far as Brenda's website goes (here) why should we go further ? WP:NOT a genealogy database or Burke's Peerage. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per my comments on the earlier batches of pseudo-distant-royal-ish-folks. Carlossuarez46 06:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all and everyone beyond 10th in line except where they are notable in their own right. BlueValour 04:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep all, Wikipedia is not a paper dictionary; in the interest of completeness there is no reason to delete these articles, they are doing no harm. I find them quite interesting. Jdcooper 15:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Nawlin, and is her name really Constanza Snyder Ohconfucius? ~ trialsanderrors 00:53, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.