Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iggens
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 02:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Iggens
Likely a figment of someone's imagination. Zero Google hits for "Infidel Iggens" and "Baldwin Evensworth" - and there should be, if any of this is true. Sandstein 21:09, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--blue520 22:23, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable, probable hoax. Stifle (talk) 22:35, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
First of All, I do not like the cut of this "Sandstein" person's Jib. Sandstein should mind his/her own business. Infindel Iggens is one of the unsung figures in the history of our world, and it is rare to have such a treat as to learn about this amazing person. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WoodDaver (talk • contribs).
- Note: User:WoodDaver has since also vandalised my user page. Sandstein 04:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Sir Isaac Lime 02:49, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Unverified, probable hoax. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:11, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Moe ε 18:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
I am Dr.James Baldwin, professor of great detectives not known throughout the world. I have done extensive research on many detectives like Iggens, in fact, I have seen many of the files that Iggens himself has written, and I must say, that it is disgracefull that just because people have not heard of Iggens as much as they have of other great detectives,that it should be deleted. Iggens is one of the great masters in detectivry and it is very sad that this many people think he is a blubbering fool out of someone's imagination. It is a disgrace to him, and all unknown detectives, and to myself too. Wonderfull biography to whoever wrote it. -Dr. James Baldwin
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.