Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icho Ryu Aikijujutsu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted as a copyright violation from association website (aeropagitica) 21:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Icho Ryu Aikijujutsu
This article has been proded/deproded, tagged for cleanup/detagged and then blanked by the original author. So I'm sending it to AFD to get a wider community consensus about its suitability for Wikipedia. For now, I'll abstain from "voting". I am the one who orginally proded it, but I'm unsure now. Deli nk 17:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. A web search shows quite a few hits for this, but they all say things like "Icho Ryu is our style" (my emphasis); in other words, not exactly independent sources. Doesn't seem particularly notable outside a very narrow group, and the tone certainly suggests vanity. Kafziel Talk 17:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Localized school. Not-notable. Peter Rehse 18:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - it does seem to be legit and info can be found on the founder, and it does seem to be known atleast locally.[1]~[2]~[3]~[4] There also seems to be atleast one dojo affiliated with this.[5] Definately the article needs to be sourced... --Mista-X 12:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete please. I'm Bernie Lau's chief instructor for Icho Ryu, and it's definitely not a notable thing outside a small group, even if we do keep most of the dojo off the map of the internet. 5 member dojo in USA only, and one in South America. But the text is taken from the keystone dojo website and I know for a fact it was not with permission.
- Do you have a url to the original website? I can't seem to find the page this was copied from. Once we can confirm it's a copyright violation we can take it off immediately. Kafziel Talk 00:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.