Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISO 3166-2:TT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per discussion after article update. Shell ^babelfish 21:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ISO 3166-2:TT

This is all covered in Trinidad and Tobago. Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed. Blood red sandman 12:03, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, completely unnecessary to have a separate article on this. -- Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 12:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for now, unless secondary references are included that substantiate notability, then maybe, if you can find me, I'll change my vote. Addhoc 12:07, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom ST47 12:25, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom -- Whpq 14:24, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect -- there are several more of these that currently just redirect to the country they represent. Keep -- article has now been expanded somewhat similar to how other articles for these codes are structured. --Polaron | Talk 16:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The ISO codes for a specific country is too crufty for even me, unless possibly if there is some unique or interesting verified and reference history behind these codes.-- danntm ^T _C 19:43, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • You are aware that there is a whole bunch of these articles. One option might be to redirect them to lists of subdivisions of each country and incorporate the codes into those lists. --Polaron | Talk 19:48, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

• That is a possibility. I believe there are templates, such as template:mergeto, to give notice of proposed merger. A concern to keep in mind is the length of any final list.-- danntm ^T _C 02:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

• Strong keep It is part of a series and this sort of information is highly unsuitable for merging, especially the larger examples. Piccadilly 13:25, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• keep please per piccadilly this is not suitable to be merged and part of a series Yuckfoo 00:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.