Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IQcuties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Avi 16:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] IQcuties

Contested PROD. This article has no verifiable sources, and reads like an advertisement. See also a comment by an outside user at Talk:High IQ society. Ziggurat 03:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:WEB. No Alexa ranking [1]--TBCTaLk?!? 03:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:WEB and WP:V. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, spam. Rhobite 04:25, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Em-jay-es 06:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No significance claimed or established. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Site is signicant in that it is the first online dating site to utilize a test for the selection of members. Geneffects 06:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Can you verify that with reliable sources? --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 10:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Yes, but not directly. A search of DMOZ for dating sites mentioning a exam or test does not turn up any that are requirements for membership. Many sites have tests, but they still accept 100% of the applicants. I have further verified this with exhaustive research Geneffects 13:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
      • eHarmony doesn't accept all applicants. But even if iqcuties were the only site to have a test, the article would still need to be deleted because it is not verifiable. Rhobite 13:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Guinnog 19:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. No different from "graduate only" sites. --Richhoncho 20:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, Tree Biting Conspiracy, and Sjakkalle. William Pietri 20:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - even if something is unique, and a good idea, it is not necessarily notable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Seidenstud (talk • contribs) 22:11, 30 June 2006 UTC.
• Keep I think the concept of a dating site using an IQ test is sufficiently notable to warrant a WP article. Lurker 10:31, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment User:Geneffects has posted a rebuttal at Talk:IQcuties. Ziggurat 21:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Just some website. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 17:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.