Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFSZ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] IFSZ

Article has been around for a while and has not conformed to WP:WEB

Reasons for failing WP:WEB

1. No other sources other than information from IFSZ(No News Articles, Other Web Sites, ect)

2. No Inpedenant award given.

3. Has not been distributed via a site that is both well known and independent of the creators Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 04:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete advertising article. the main article InvisionFree Network is enough--Ageo020 04:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:WEB, reads like poorly written WP:VSCA. WP:NOT a place to talk about how your web forum is the best, especially when it's hosted on Invision... --Kinu ^t/_c 05:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I removed the "staff members" and "elite membership" sections which clearly did not belong in an encyclopedia, but what's left looks like some quotations from a web forum, not an encyclopedia article about it, and there are WP:WEB problems in any event. --Metropolitan90 06:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Since it fails WP:WEB, WP:VSCA, and WP:NOT I won't even bother mentioning that it's a poorly written fluff piece. --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 16:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- as above, though the first thing I thought of was WP is not a web hosting/blog especially in light of this line "We have set up the ability for our dedicated members* to have their very own ifsz.com email address". — MrDolomite | Talk 03:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Dont Delete I am going to fully re-write this article, I do not believe it should be deleted. I know this site. I have the original article saved, just incase you need it. (Did it. Too late though. I'll do some more later) - User: Iced Kola

Comment I know this site as well (I have been a member since 2003) and the Article Totally fails WP:WEB, it is Nothing against the IFSZ but has to do with Notability. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 02:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Dispite the redo this article still Fails all WP:WEB Criteria. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 04:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.