Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyde and Eido

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was REDIRECTED to Zatch Bell! characters. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hyde and Eido

Prod removed. Page is better since then (was empty), but this still doesn't warrant it's own page. These characters are not even mentioned on the show's page, so they hardly need their own. If someone more familiar with the show thinks anything here is worth merging, I wouldn't object, except that most of this writing is rather pov anyway. I'm assuming since they aren't even listed under characters on that page now, they probably aren't very major, but I don't know the show.-Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 00:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

  • del original research, fancruft. `'mikka (t) 01:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • They are worth merging. I am familiar with the show. -Myalysk
    • You may want to review the original research rules, linked above, and avoid creating more such pages instead of inserting info into existing pages that have no info on the characters. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 01:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Redirect to Zatch Bell! characters. This editor has a bad habit of cluttering Zatch Bell and Bobobo-bo-related articles with unnecessary info. Danny Lilithborne 03:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
    • So they are mentioned there... That's odd, I could have sworn I read some article about characters from this show, in addition to the main article, and couldn't find either of them. Maybe there's another one... About redirects though, is anyone going to be actually searching for "hyde and eido"? Seems more likely someone would just be looking for one name in the search box. Adding a link from the Hyde disambig page and.. I dunno, nothing at Eido, maybe make that a redirect. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 03:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
      • I'm a fan of the show too, even when I nominated the above article for deletion. Now I see it's better to have a big article for all the mamodo characters. Looking back, it seems that some editor had originally created a bunch of mamodo/bookkeeper pair articles, and they all got merged into one. (Myalysk tried to revive Kolulu and Lori as well.) Danny Lilithborne 03:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
    • I really don't think they should be deleted because there is enough info on them for them to have an article. I also think characters like Kido and Dr. Riddles, Bari and Gustav, Ted and Jeed, Laila and Albert, Earth and Elly, Penny and Uri, and Kolulu and Lori should their own page because they play MAJOR important roles in the series. -

Myalysk

      • I haven't seen the entire series yet, but I think you're overplaying the importance of these characters, especially Kolulu (she only appears in one episode, just because she's the reason Zatch wants to become king doesn't make her major). The characters that presently have articles have enough information on them to warrant an article. Out of the mamodo/bookkeeper pairs you listed, the only one that I believe warrants their own article is Kido/Dr. Riddles, and I've been in fact thinking about doing that, but I don't know enough first-hand information to do that yet. Danny Lilithborne 23:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Well for Kido and Dr. Riddles, you can start with their stats, mention the majestic twelve, use references from episodes 49-50, watch the show during the devolo ruins saga (ep. 58-?), or use info from these sites:
  • GASH!!
  • Moge!
  • Golden Gash

And at least provide mini info for each encountered mamodo that doesn't have any info or at least enough info. Example: Donpocchu & Goman: One of the weak mamodo that was quickly defeated by Bari. Myalysk

      • No. The article is cluttered enough as it is. Danny Lilithborne 07:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
      • ALL I WANT IS SOMETHING NEW TO HAPPEN IS THIS ZATCH BELL! ARTICLE!!....DAMN!!!

Gerohoshi 07:59, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/r/t/Wikipedia%7EArticles_for_deletion_Hyde_and_Eido_f479.html"