Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huping Hu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Huping Hu

Biography of a "biophysicist and attorney in private practice". Liberally seasoned with "citation needed" tags, this article fails to satisfy the Wikipedia:Notability (academics) proposal (not to mention notability practice in general) and is almost certainly a vanity piece. The anon IP who created it, 24.185.23.19 (talk • contribs), also edited New York Law School, which Hu apparently attended, as well as spamming Consciousness, Spin and Quantum mind with Hu's Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory (currently also up for deletion). Anville 17:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Good work rooting him out. Byrgenwulf 17:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. Deli nk 18:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Thryduulf 18:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Tempshill 20:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Huping Hu. This piece was initially written by me when Wikipedia was in its infant stage back in 2004 as a way to introduce our Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory and its originator, me, because someone cited our Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory in the Consciousness and, I believe, quantum mind entry. Of course, I'm not notable and vanity is last thing I have in mind. I'm perfect happy with my life and work without any entry to Wikipedia. Please be advised that Anville's statement with respect to spamming is factually false and, upon information and belief, libelous. Our Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory speaks for itself and if it was added or edited within quantum mind and spin the purpose was related to relevancy not vanity. May GOD bless Wikipedia and its participants so that it may stay useful, innovative, diverse and informative. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.89.197.56 (talk • contribs).

Warning: your statement "Please be advised that Anville's statement with respect to spamming is factually false and, upon information and belief, libelous" is in clear violation of WP:NLT. ---CH 23:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Some evidence that our anon is indeed Huping Hu:

The dyn.optonline.net anon used 24.185.23.19 (talk • contribs) from 27 November 2004 to 12 April 2005; geolocated Brooklyn, NY

The nycmny.east.verizon.net anon used 72.89.197.56 (talk • contribs) which is so far a single use account; apparently geolocated in NYC area; note that East Village, Manhattan is near NYU.

Make of this what you will.---CH 23:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Seems to be a clear case of WP:VAIN. Good work, Anville, Thryduulf, and UncleG! ---CH 23:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete linas 04:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.